Also on Wikipedia

Search results

IT IS POSSIBLE TO USE YOUR BRAIN CAPACITY 100 % BY CPH4 ???


Average people include me use only 10% of brain capacity by working,learning,moving,socializing,etc.....

What happen if someone reach 100% brain capacity ?

These higher percentages correlate with her brain capacity usage
1) control of the cell;
2) control of others;
3) control of matter;
4) control of time.

A blue crystalline synthetic drug called CPH4 (finction name) that make someone reach 100% brain capacity.
CPH4 is a molecule that the pregnant woman is making it after six weeks of pregnancy. in very - very tiny quantities. And it's true that the power of this product for a baby is the power of an atomic bomb.

Does the C.P.H.4 molecule really exist as shown in the movie Lucy? If so, how does it work?

There is a metabolic enzyme called 6-carboxytetrahydropterin synthase or CPH4 synthase that acts as a catalyst in the following reaction

7,8-dihydroneopterin 3'-triphosphate + H2O <----------------> 6-carboxy-5,6,7,8-tetrahydropterin + acetaldehyde + triphosphate

Where can I find CPH4 ?
So the 10% rule is a complete and total myth. But can a drug like CPH4 improve your brain’s performance? Well first of all, the drug CPH4 doesn’t exist. The blue candy looking drug that is shown in the movie Lucy is completely fake, looking more like a prop from Breaking Bad than something produced in your body. The movie gives the explanation that it’s based on a molecule that helps infants and fetuses ignore the pain caused by growing bones. This does exist, but it has absolutely no connection to CPH4.
There is in fact a molecule known as CPH4 in medical science. Its full name is 6-carboxytetrahydropterin synthase. This is an enzyme found in the cells of millions of organisms, but primarily in bacteria. Enzymes in cells are used to produce other types of molecules that are necessary for the cell to function. The CPH4 enzyme produces Queuosine. Queuosine is a molecule that essentially helps hold the tRNA of bacteria cells together. It’s nothing more than glue for other molecules to stick to each other. It literally has no impact on intelligence or brain capacity (bacteria don’t have brains after all).
As a result of this movie people have taken to selling CPH4 online in an attempt to take advantage of uninformed customers. Do NOT under any circumstances consume anything labeled CPH4. The best case scenario is that you would be taking the literal CPH4 syntheses described above, in which case absolutely nothing positive would happen to your body. The worst case scenario however could be accidentally ingesting something harmful. You don’t know what is being put into these mysterious packages.
Your brain’s capacity is theoretically unknown, and so you can’t simply take a magic drug or pill and expect to become more intelligent or gain instant knowledge about a subject like Scarlett’s character in Lucy. However some true nootropics exist. Real life nootropic drugs allow your brain to use its existing capacity more fully by improving connections within the brain and heightening the speed with which it transfers information. Modafinil is a proven commodity. It improves concentration, increases awareness, and improves short term memory recall. These things will allow you to perform better. There isn’t a drug out there that is going to make you “smarter” in the classic sense of the word, but you CAN increase your day-to-day efficiency with proven products such as Modafinil.
So don’t waste your money or risk your health with a potentially dangerous product being sold as part of a get-rich-quick scheme where you are the victim. Instead, use 100% of your brain and make a smart decision. Buy something that thousands of other people have tried and loved. There is a reason why people continue to buy Modafinil again and again: Because it works. As CPH4 is not yet avaliable, when it available think about what you can do it ?? It's anything, you are anywhere.

© TASA - 2016.

Big Bang, Deflated? Universe May Have Had No Beginning At All


A new theory claims that the universe may not have started with a bang. According to this new study, the universe was not ever a singularity or an infinitely minor and infinitely dense point of matter at all. In actual fact, the universe may have no start at all. Study co-author Saurya Das, a theoretical physicist at the University of Lethbridge, Canada, said "Our theory suggests that the age of the universe could be infinite," This new notion could also clarify what dark matter is actually made of, Das added. According to the Big Bang theory, the universe was born nearly 13.8 billion years ago. All the matter that occurs today was once squeezed into an infinitely dense, infinitely small, ultra-hot dot called a singularity. This little fireball then blasted and growth to the early universe started. This singularity comes from the math of Einstein's theory of general relativity, which defines how mass warps space-time, and from an additional equation (called Raychaudhuri's equation) that foretells whether the route of something will merge or diverge with time. Going backward in time, as claimed by these equations, all matter in the cosmos was once in a tiny single point — which is also known as the Big Bang singularity.

But that's not quite accurate. In Einstein's formulation, the laws of physics essentially break before the singularity is touched. But researchers generalize backward as if the physics equations still hold, states Robert Brandenberger, a theoretical cosmologist at McGill University, who was not the part of this study.

Brandenberger also told Live Science "So when we say that the universe begins with a big bang, we really have no right to say that," There are other difficulties developing in physics — specifically, that the two most leading theories, quantum mechanics and general relativity, can't be merged to come up with single concept. Quantum mechanics states that the actions of tiny subatomic particles are basically uncertain. This against the Einstein's general relativity, which is deterministic, implying that once all the regular laws are identified, the future is entirely preset by the past, Das said. And neither theory clarifies what dark matter, an unseen form of matter that applies a gravitational pull on regular matter but cannot be identified by most telescopes, is actually made of.

Quantum modification

Das and his coworkers wanted a way to solve at least some of these problems. To do so, they considered an older method of picturing quantum mechanics, called Bohmian mechanics. In Bohmian mechanics, an unseen variable rules the strange actions of subatomic particles. Unlike other formulations of quantum mechanics, it offers a way to compute the path of a particle. By utilizing this old-fashioned method of quantum theory, the scientists calculated a small rectification term that may well be comprised in Einstein's theory of general relativity. Then, they figured out what would occur in deep time. So what’s the outcome? In this new formulation, there is no singularity at all, and the universe as we know it is infinitely old.

How to test this theory?

Das said that one way of understanding the quantum correction term in their equation is that it is connected to the density of dark matter, if so, the cosmos could be packed with a superfluid made of theoretical particles, for instance the gravity-carrying particles known as gravitons, or ultra-cold, ghostly particles known as axions. Das also said that One method to test the theory is to look at how dark matter is dispersed in the cosmos and comprehend if it matches the properties of the suggested superfluid

Nevertheless, the new equations are just one way to settle quantum mechanics and general relativity. For example, a portion of string theory acknowledged as string gas cosmology forecasts that the universe once had a long-lasting static period, while other theories forecast there was once a cosmic "recoil," where the universe first contracted till it touched a very small size, then initiated expanding, Brandenberg said.

©TASA-2016